Jose M. Osorio/Chicago Tribune via AP
- Doctors protested at Stanford Medical Center Friday, saying the hospital failed to prioritize vaccines for front-line workers and instead gave too many to office staff and others working from home.
- Internal emails from hospital leadership acknowledged the vaccine rollout plan failed to include enough residents and fellows.
- The demonstration comes as at least one other hospital has come under fire for allowing staff who aren’t on the front line to receive the vaccine.
- Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
Stanford doctors on Friday protested the system’s vaccine rollout plan, as multiple hospitals come under fire for giving too many doses to staff who aren’t on the front line, according to reports from San Francisco Chronicle.
Physicians held a demonstration at Stanford Medical Center on Friday morning, saying the hospital neglected frontline workers in favor of high-ranking officials and employees who work from home.
According to a letter seen by the San Francisco Chronicle, protestors sent a letter to top Stanford officials saying that only seven residents and fellows were included in the first round of vaccinations, which began on Friday. The hospital used an algorithm aimed at older health care workers and employees.
Representatives for Stanford did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The demonstrations come during the first week of the coronavirus vaccine rollout, which began after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the Pfizer vaccine for emergency use last week. Vaccinations will first be available to health care workers and nursing home residents. The rest of the US population should expect to gain access to the vaccine in Spring 2021.
In anticipation of the rollout, health care systems across the country spent weeks figuring out who on staff should get vaccinated first. Intermountain Healthcare in Utah, Northwell Health in New York, and Yale New Haven Health in Connecticut told Business Insider this month that health care workers in direct contact with coronavirus patients would be first in line for the vaccine.
Even as many hospitals say they are reserving the first vaccine doses for front-line workers, some hospital employees are worried that their institutions aren't prioritizing correctly, or at all. Mount Sinai was criticized this week for allowing a marketing staff member based in an urgent care center to receive a vaccine on Tuesday, Politico reported.
In Stanford's case, the hospital's chief medical officer, Dr. Niraj Sehgal, apologized to staff this week for "unintended missteps" in vaccine rollout, according to a screenshot of the email shared on Twitter. Another email, sent to staff this morning, confirmed that the vaccine rollout failed to include trainees.
"There were multiple conversations leading up to this point at which time we were assured that the trainees were to be put in each wave to spread the doses out to not impact the workforce but to prioritize the group as a whole," the email said. "We realize this first allocation failed to provide the correct order of protection."
Some hospitals taking a more randomized approach to vaccine rollouts for staff may be doing so to shield themselves from legal liability. For example, if hospitals prioritize older staff to receive the vaccine, they could be opening themselves up to age discrimination. Labor and employment workers say employers likely can't require older workers to be vaccinated first, even if it's for their protection.
Karla Grossenbacher, who chairs law firm Seyfarth Shaw's labor and employment practice in Washington, DC, said that randomizing vaccine rollouts could be an okay way to steer clear of potential legal pitfalls but "wouldn't be the best way to do it." Instead, employers should focus on the different levels of risks presented by each job and prioritize that way.
Katherine Dudley Helms, managing shareholder of law firm Ogletree Deakins' Columbia, South Carolina office and a member of the firm's coronavirus task force and healthcare practice group, pointed out that randomizing vaccine rollouts could actually put a hospital at more legal risk if there were opportunities to "slide in a buddy" and have people cut the line.
"Here's the trick: it has to be truly randomized," she said, adding that it may be a better strategy for hospitals to prioritize the most at-risk workers and then randomize vaccinating everyone else.